Nexttech

Nexttech
Creating Generational Legacies

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Can Virtual Reality change the world

Inspired by Steven Rosenbaums article 
In Huffington post 
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/storytelling-in-the-world_b_9177948.html

Virtual reality creates a sense of "presence," so even if your conscious brain knows what you are observing is virtual, your emotional instincts and responsive brain absorbs the VR fiction a real experience and memory. 

Let me explain ... I was given a vr contraption to use , and told to walk across a soccer field ....as I started walking across the field, the ground came away on either side.... And I was now walking on a narrow bridge, with no support, And a sheer drop on either side.... To me this was totally real, although I knew it couldn't be!!

VR could actually change human consciousness. Inside of it, it feels like real life, it feels like truth. And you feel present in the world that you're inside and you feel present with the people that you're inside of it with.

Sort of like a movie on steroids - where you are part of the set 

VR can become more than a medium, but will fundamentally be an alternative level of human consciousness,

says  Chris Milk, who is at the forefront of exploring and inventing in VR. 

"Virtual reality has the potential to actually change the world. It's a machine, but through this machine we become more compassionate, we become more empathetic, and we become more connected. And ultimately, we become more human."

Or

Do we become more isolated in our own make believe worlds?

What happens when a violent video game feels like murder or when pornography feels like sex. 
How does that change the way humans interact or function as a society or with each other ?

What do you think? 

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

10 Insights emanating from i4j 2016 conference

Brian Rashid summarises 10 insights that came from the i4j conference -


David Nordfors, Vint Cerf and Robin Starbuck Farmanfarmaian prepared and facilitated for 2 brilliant days of innovation - a collection of 100+ top thought-leaders, activists, entrepreneurs, policy makers, executives and more. 


This will be a rolling stone that will build and add massive values in ways that nobody thought possible.... And Australia is privileged to play a part! 



1. “Senior” Entrepreneurs are a booming economy. 


Thirty-four million 50-plus year olds in the U.S. alone want to create a business of their own. This creates the opportunities to build experience incubators in organizations such as Ernst & Young’s EMEIA (Europe, Middle East, India and Africa). Companies, such as Ernst & Young, have made it a top 2016 strategic priority to design and implement cross-generational incubators. These incubators bring together Millennials with seniors so each group can bring their expertise, learn from the other and create value in the new economy


2. Women represent the largest global economy. 


The numbers alone are astounding. By 2025, women will constitute $32.8 trillion of global spending. In 2015, women constituted $16 trillion in global spending. $9 trillion of untapped spending is capped due to gender inequality and disaggregate economic influence. The women based economy is twice that as China and India, combined. One billion women will enter the workforce in the next decade, and 2 million new small businesses will be owned by women in that time. Whether it’s a Women Based Economy (check out Tracy Saville and myswirl.com), HackforHer (Christina Chen) or Supercritical Human Elevated [SHE] Economy (Monique Morrow’s piece as a co-author of the book,  i4J Disrupting Unemployment), the vision is to create an Internet of Women, an inspired collaborative platform of job creators for our global economy – built for “her,” where participation transcends gender and aspires for authentic inclusion. Can we not imagine developing the Internet of Women platform to create a world in which gainful employment is divided 50:50 amongst men and women and where there is parity for all?  Can we imagine restoring the missing element, those women who are poverty stricken and marginalized globally to double productivity? We can if we dare.


3. Companies are looking for talent. Forty percent of U.S. Companies cannot find qualified workers. This creates a huge market for organizations (both for-profit, nonprofit, government and startups) to develop skills training. Imagine the possibilities for nonprofits to become profitable, for profits to expand, and government to fund activities that lead to the enhancement of the critical, yet missing skills sets that companies are desperate to employ.


4. Schools need to update their curriculums. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we had 5.4 million job openings and 7.9 million people who were unemployed (5%). So clearly there is a gap. The lecture model is the most frequently used model in 80% of the classrooms today worldwide. It was developed at the beginning of the 1900s to produce factory workers who follow directions well. Today we need students who can think and prepare for a world that is constantly changing. The one size fits all delivery is setting us up for a crisis (see no. 3 above as proof). Instead, we will move into an algorithmic approach to learning that is focused on you, the student.


5. Special needs no longer have to be a handicap. People who have difficulties getting jobs because of special conditions, might be helped by modern information technology to get good jobs. Think databases that correlate special conditions with special abilities. There is a company in Germany, for example, that hires blind people to conduct breast exams in an effort to detect breast cancer. The logic here is blind people have a heightened sense of touch and are more likely to rely on this skill to diagnose more accurately. Very important work.


6. Technology can turn nonprofits into for profit businesses. Most nonprofits rely on philanthropic dollars and grants to exist. If you take a peak at no. 3 above, you’ll see that companies are looking for talent they can’t find. So, why not partner with companies, or even better, banks to pay their customers to use the nonprofit’s services. I have written about this before, but here is the idea again. A bank wants new customers. They should offer their new customers a free 10-week skill set building training at a nonprofit like Samaschool. Samaschool, currently a nonprofit doing amazing data driven work to help prepare low income individuals find meaningful and sustainable work, could partner with a bank. Here is the win-win-win. The bank gets new customers who are going to invest with the bank for life. The more the customers can compete for good jobs, the more money they make. The more money they make, the more they invest, take out loans for home ownership, and so on. Customers win because they are now developing skills that help them do meaningful work and make a living. Nonprofits win because they don’t have to beg and plead for grants, can pay their staff higher wages, and expand in ways they want (which all happens when the banks purchase the courses for their new clients, as opposed to Samaschool relying on grants to offer courses).


7. The one page proposal. A few years ago Patrick Riley, author of the One-Page Proposal got a phone call from a homeless woman. She was calling from the public library because she could place free calls from the local branch. She showered there, too. One day, she came across the book, One-Page Proposal. She called the author of the book from the library and she asked if he could help her create her own one page proposal to the bank. She explained that she sleeps in the ATM alcove at night, and no one cleans it. She wanted the one page proposal to ask the bank to clean the alcove. Patrick helped her, they wrote a one page proposal, and sent it to the bank. The bank did not clean the alcove, but they did something even better. They hired her to clean it. Then they gave her a promotion. She currently runs the cleaning service for a number of banks in the area, and employees a few people. This woman in Memphis is representative of a huge rise of free agents (800 million worldwide, 55 million in the U.S.). The one page proposal allows people to create jobs for themselves based on their own skill sets. It opens the opportunity to create a new job around a new idea, in addition to existing jobs. Patrick also told us that companies use the one pager model as a challenge to potential employees. For example, if Xerox is facing a problem, they request a one page proposal about different solutions, and will hire from there. It also allows companies to eliminate the HR representatives and focus on the direct hiring manager to people relationship.


 

8. Upwork on the rise. Upwork, (O-desk and Elance joined forces and created Upwork) has done over $1 billion in sales from clients, over four million clients, 10 million freelancers and over 2,900 categories of work in the last few years. These are not just small projects. Some last several months and even years making it more than just a gig economy. If you have a computer and internet signal, you can hire or work using Upwork. A world of talent is one click away. This is both for doing things at a cheaper price, as well as finding new things one had not thought of doing previously.


9. Linkedin is innovating for its users. One of the co-founders of LinkedIn came to the i4j Summit. He shared that employers have a desperate need for healthcare, advanced manufacturing, and energy (specifically IT) talent. He also announced that on March 14, LinkedIn in partnership with the Markle Foundation, is releasing a program that enables employers to point students to some of the programs and jobs looking to fill these roles. Linkedin is always thinking through ways to guide job-seekers. This is one more example.


10. Making things could make you money, and solve key manufacturing problems. The maker movement is a popular one, and people are making a living creating cool things. But that’s only a small part of the potential for the democratization of technology in these circles. As traditional manufacturing jobs decline, and we run out of resources, contemporary maker technologies can support localized manufacturing. 3D printers allow me to draw out a prosthetic arm in the United States and print it in Africa. 3d printers allow me to design a prosthetic hand in South Africa, print it in the United States, and then collaborate remotely with Iceland by emailing design files back and forth. With nearly 3000 community workshops (Fab Labsmakerspaces, etc) and hundreds of Maker Faires worldwide, Makers hope to bring all hands on deck to solve local problems on a global scale. Cool.

I could make a list of 30 things I learned. AI and algorithms are making it easier for both job seekers and companies to find each other. That’s exciting, too, but is only the start. As we look even further into the future of work, what kind of ecosystems could we imagine where people create new jobs, ones that have never been considered before. 20 years ago, asking for money to build an app would have resulted in you being laughed out of the room. The average salary for this job today is over $100k.

Maybe that’s the test. When people laugh, we’re on the right track. I don’t know. But whether I am laughing about ideas or not, I do know one thing:

The future of work puts a smile on my face, and that feels like a good place to start.


Brian Rashid is a professional speaker on the leadership, innovation, and the future of work. Email him: connect@brianrashid.com.


Monday, February 1, 2016

Education through collaboration and masterminds

The big question-how to educate people to operate in such a new world--not only the those with natural inclination to entrepreneurship and technology.

WE have developed a great tool in my school of communications for bringing together students from social sciences and computer sciences. We created   a Media Innovation Lab where students from CS ,psychology and communications(usually technophobes) in their third year to work together on joint projects including development of social apps and prototypes and robotics.

These collaborations creates wonders. To listen to the Communication and Psychology students talk about their products at the end of the year-is amazing. The technophobia has gone. The skills they learned are very valuable for the type of world you Curt described.
This can be done at any age including elementary schools.
Again -thank you Curt for the insights. Glad your team put emphasis on the importance of the narrative.
best
Noam

Commentary about i4j summit


Cosmin - To paraphrase a discussion I had with Mei Lin, people, ideas and actions thrive when they find and act within their tribe (=culture, ecosystem, etc.). 

Response to Steve Denning's proposition to employ a person based on the ability to learn vs what they know

 Curt's Hiring filter at SRI was to put creativity, curiosity, collaboration, and passion above specific skills.  I knew if they had these attributes they could learn almost anything — hey, that is what innovation is because, by definition, it is the creation of sustainable new knowledge.  

People had to  stand up every 2-8 weeks and present their value propositions. 

 This is a way to implement the kinds of ideas we believed in much more efficiently, effectively, and scalably, both inside and outside the enterprise. 

Heather MacgowanI could not agree more!
Education needs to balance both knowledge formation (expertise) and, perhaps more importantly, learning agility. 

The key question to advertise is not "what do I know?" but rather "how fast have I been able to learn?"

Hi Curt,

Great idea, but here's what you are missing. 

Just kidding. :-}

It really is a great idea. I do have one suggestion though. You say that these communities would be "a virtuous cycle where workers can find work, advertise their unique skills, and asynchronously develop new skills to make themselves continuously more valuable."

I would like to suggest that there be much more emphasis on "advertising learning capabilities" than on "advertising unique skills." 

At present, we have x million positions vacant and y million people looking to fill those positions. Why is this?

You can say that it is in the inefficiency of the labor market and that's true. But there is another dimension to this. 

What you see is firms looking for specific bundles of skills and experience, e.g. as shown in the examples given by Gregory Tseytin

“5 yrs. experience developing in C++ or 5 yrs. experience in OOP”
“7+ years in Java application development”
“2+ years of Node.js development using common middlewares such as express, async, and q.”

The chance of someone having exactly that particular bundle of skills and experience and being available in that time and place is remote. 

Moreover, suppose the firm does find the right person--a hexagon shaped worker to be fitted into a hexagon-shaped slot. Then the firm may abruptly discover that some new computer language or tool is required--say Python. So now the firm needs octagon-shaped workers. Do they then throw those hexagonal workers aside and advertise for octagonal workers i.e. with five years experience in Python?

In a fast moving workplace, the whole process of trying to get exact matches of needs and skills is doomed.

One part of the solution to this tangle of issues is for firms to start doing what they once did, namely, gulp, retraining existing workers. What a strange idea! This comes back to the management mindset issue that I mentioned in my presentation on the Creative Economy last Thursday. In the new workplace, the team becomes the asset, not the product they are working on. Nurturing and upgrading the skills of the team becomes a central management preoccupation. That's what we saw on the site visits of the Learning Consortium for the Creative Economy.

The other part of the solution is to fundamentally rethink the whole recruitment process and HR mindset.

The current approach of trying to find the worker with the exact set of skills and experience is obsolete. What the firms should be looking for are "fast learners." The skills that the firm needs today are not going to be the skills that it needs tomorrow. So why not recognize this and plan for it?

One firm that has done this is Menlo Innovations, a small software firm in Ann Arbor, MI, that writes software for high reliability medical devices. The CEO Richard Sheridan has written a book about it, called Joy Inc. Well worth reading.

Menlo explicitly recruits for "fast learners", not specific skills. When they need new staff, they invite a bunch of people in, without being particular about their backgrounds or experience. Physicists, anthropologists, philsosophers as well as programmers. They might have 30 potential recruits and they sit them down with their existing employees for a morning of "speed dating." The question for the existing employees is: would you want to work with this person? 

Those who get accepted are invited in to work for a day on a specific task with another employee in "pair programming." The question again is: would you want to keep working with this person, because they are adding value and learning?

If that works ok, then they are invited in to work with an employee for a week.

If that works ok, then they are invited in for a month. 

If that works ok, then they are hired. 

In this way, the firm has people with quite diverse backgrounds and a demonstrated capability for fast learning and collaboration. It doesn't matter whether the work requires Java or C++ or Python, it has people who can quickly learn. The result is that churn is eliminated and the firm can cope with pretty much anything. 

In the same spirit, I would like to suggest that, in the communities you are proposing, there be more emphasis on "advertisng learning capabilities" than on "advertising unique skills." The key question to advertise is not "what do I know?" but rather "how fast have I been able to learn?"

What am I missing? :-}

Warmly
Steve


On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Curt Carlson <curt@practiceofinnovation.com>wrote:
Team: Here is a rough outline of one of my big take aways from the conference (in David’s formulation for a meme: name, definition, narrative).  Other names are welcomed.  More in a bit.  What am I missing?

Name:   Empowered worker communities (EPCs)

Definition: The emerging virtuous cycle between networked workers, available work, and skills development on emerging Internet, h/w, s/w, and AI enabled platforms. 

Narrative:  The advent of online web applications that connect workers with work plus the advent of individualized digital education creates a virtuous cycle where workers can find work, advertise their unique skills, and asynchronously develop new skills to make themselves continuously more valuable.  It puts power back in the hands of the worker and allows more freedom and choice.  Importantly, this generation of learning platforms (e.g., Cornerstone Math) promises dramatic improvements in skills development, an enabling technology.  

The learning platforms can include academic topics (algebra), tools (spreadsheets), and also collaborative learning and value creation systems and networks.  These collaborative networks can be built by individuals who can then leverage the genius of their extended team to add more value to their offerings. These global collaborative networks can ultimately make the world “transparent” so that a great team can be assembled for every project.  The teams can be either proprietary or open to the world.  Workers can be both participants on other's teams while leaders of their own teams.  

These emerging empowered worker communities have the potential to transform the rate of innovative success around the world.  They open the possibility of a completely different kind of company — one composed of “gigers" but who all share services, insurance, healthcare, and opportunities for new business.  This represents a merging of the best networking ideas, the best value creation principles, and the best principles from the learning sciences (see here Doug Engelbart and the idea of a NIC).  Clearly it will also transform how established companies work and innovate.  

Top down government employment programs are only of marginal help in the Global Innovation Economy, which moves so fast and that has so many possibilities for unique work.  Only the worker is aware of the unique kinds of work to be done, their individual motivations and abilities, and the skills required to add more value to their offerings.  The government cannot build powerful collaborative network communities, where real  genius resides.  These platforms are on the path of creating meaningful work for millions.

On Jan 31, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Curt Carlson <curt@practiceofinnovation.com> wrote:

Dear David, Robin, Vint, and Team,
You are the best.  This was a terrific conference.  It is inspiring to see all the progress over these years.  Seeing real solutions come out of the fog of only a few years ago shows how prescient you were in developing this area and in giving it a unique twist, not only in terms of content (e.g., the importance of narrative) but also format.  The quality and passion of the participants is a testament to the importance of the issues and the value of the meeting.  Mazeltov to the Nth power!
All the best,
Curt

PS  Steve, What am I missing?

Curtis R. Carlson, Ph.D.
Founder and CEO Practice of Innovation
President and CEO SRI International, 1998-2014
Our most important innovation is the way we work

The rise of the 3rd industrial revolution

Thanks Heather Macgowan:- 
 I came across this today and thought you all might enjoy it. This is a 30 minute talk by Jeremy Rifkin about the rise of the third industrial revolution. He identifies an an economic/industrial revolution as containing simultaneous breakthroughs in three areas: communication, energy, and transportation. By this measure the first was telegraph + steam + rail, the second was telephone+oil+combustion engine/car and the the third is all driven in one way or another by IoT (communication, green tech,autonomous vehicles). All of which is both enabling the sharing economy, prosumers (combined consumers and producers) and an a near zero marginal cost society.